In the US! where the judicial system is more liberal! a taxpayer can appeal almost any Nuances in the action taken by the IRS. However! judges pay attention to whether the irregularities in the audit process had a direct impact on the final tax liability. If not! such complaints are considered unfounded.
Ukrainian legislation provides ample opportunities for protecting rights
But these opportunities must be used wisely. For example! if you are home owner data sure that the order was issued with a gross violation of the procedure! you should think about whether these violations were such that they could change the content of the audit conclusions? If so! this may be part of the argument in a lawsuit against the tax notice-decision.
It is also important to remember about deadlines. Filing a claim regarding the consequences of an Nuances in the inspection requires strict adherence to the deadlines established by the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine.
Is there any point in appealing the order?
On the one hand! canceling an order after admission makes no practical what is a company’s reputation and how to maintain it sense: you will not restore the violated right! because the inspection has already taken place. But on the other hand! if the order contains serious violations that may affect the validity of the decisions based on the inspection results! these arguments should be used.
Conclusion: act strategically
Appealing an order is not just a legal procedure! it is part of a larger strategy. Before taking such a step! it is important to assess the prospects of the case. The key point here is how much the procedural violations affected the results of the azb directory inspection. If you feel that the system is unfairly pressuring you! remember: judicial protection should not be just a right! but an effective tool. And this requires strategic thinking and considered decisions.
